Fertility by non-Hispanic white ethnic group, etc.

Fertility by non-Hispanic white ethnic group, etc.

In my post on American fertility rates by racial group Mike Keesey asks: ‘It’d also be interesting to see what’s going on within “non-Hispanic whites”.’ One can explore this question in the GSS. Let’s look at ancestry group (e.g., German, French, etc.), religion, belief in God, political ideology, intelligence and education, for non-Hispanic whites. The data is limited to the 2000s, and I also constrained to those age 45 and up. Then I looked at the “CHILDS” variable, which asks the respondent how many children they have. Taking the mean of this value gives us a sense of the rank order in fertility. Note that this is not total fertility rate. That should be clear from the values being well above 2 in most cases. Additionally, I recombined some categories, so that “British” is the amalgamation of English, Scottish and Welsh ancestry. The “Irish” class almost certainly includes both Scotch-Irish (doing the regional and religious breakdown this seems obvious), and the Irish without modifiers. For intelligence I used “WORDSUM”. The variables I input into the GSS can be found at the bottom of the post so you can replicate.

Mean # of childrenN
Ancestry
German2.47911
French2.43169
Nordic2.22277
Irish2.36759
Italian2.18311
British2.261033
Intelligence
Low intelligence2.45287
Average intelligence2.391153
Above average intelligence2.19709
Highest educational attainment
Less than high school2.93720
High school2.372970
Junior college2.25412
Bachelor2.03952
Graduate1.93687
Political ideology
Liberal1.99954
Moderate2.371690
Conservative2.431855
Religious preference
Protestant2.393355
Catholic2.531342
Jewish1.83155
No religion1.78639

I believe much of the difference among white non-Hispanics by ancestry is caused by other variables. In particular, the low values for Italians is probably a function of their disproportionately urban residence patterns in comparison to German Americans. Other white ethnic groups (the sample sizes were smaller for these constraints) with a strong urban bias show the same pattern.

To replicate, go to http://sda.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/hsda?harcsda+gss08.

Under “Analysis” at the top left select “Comparison of Means.”

Dependent: CHILDS

Row: WORDSUM(r:0-4″Low intelligence”;5-7″Average intelligence”;8-10″Above average intelligence”) DEGREE GOD(r:1-2″Atheist and Agnostic”;3″Higher Power”;4-6″Believe in God”) polviews(r:1-3″Liberal”;4″Moderate”;5-7″Conservative”) RELIG ETHNIC(r:2,11″German”;3,10″French”;7,9,19,26″Nordic”;14″Irish”;15″Italian”;8,24″British”)

German = Germany + Austria
French = France + French Canadian
Nordic = Norway, Denmark, Sweden and Finland
British = Scottish, English and Welsh

Razib Khan