Razib Khan One-stop-shopping for all of my content

June 28, 2011

Reify my genes!


In the comments below Antonio pointed me to this working paper, What Do DNA Ancestry Tests Reveal About Americans’ Identity? Examining Public Opinion on Race and Genomics. I am perhaps being a bit dull but I can’t figure where its latest version is found online (I stumbled upon what looks like another working paper version on one of the authors’ websites). Here’s the abstract:

Genomics research will soon have a deep impact on many aspects of our lives, but its political implications and associations remain undeveloped. Our broad goal in this research project is to analyze what Americans are learning about genomic science, and how they are responding to this new and potentially fraught technology.

We pursue that goal here by focusing on one arena of the genomics revolution — its relationship to racial and ethnic identity. Genomic ancestry testing may either blur racial boundaries by showing them to be indistinct or mixed, or reify racial boundaries by revealing ancestral homogeneity or pointing toward a particular geographic area or group as likely forebears. Some tests, or some contexts, may permit both outcomes. In parallel fashion, genomic information about race ...

December 5, 2010

On that Native American ancestor

Filed under: Genetics,Genomics,Personal genomics,Scientific Genealogy — Razib Khan @ 2:29 pm

Traces of Sub-Saharan African and Amerindian admixture in old stock European Americans:

Some people like to overestimate extra-European admixture in old stock Americans, while others take the position that it never happened. It did happen, and I can prove it, but certainly not to a great extent, otherwise I wouldn’t be bending over backwards to find it.

Basically, after some initial experiments, I can report that Sub-Saharan African segments of around 2 megabases or more show up regularly in my Southern European, old stock American and British samples. They’re much less common in other individuals of European origin.


I believe that most of the Sub-Saharan African specific segments arrived in Southern Europe during the early middle ages, with Muslim invasions from North Africa. On the other hand, in the UK they’re probably a legacy of the Roman Empire (see here) and slave trade, in which the British obviously played a major role. I suppose I don’t have to explain how it’s possible for white Americans to carry African segments….

I discount the role of the Roman Empire. Rather, I think the key point is to focus on the maritime nature of Britain’s possessions, and the historically attested presence of numerous sailors from Africa and Asia in port cities in the 18th century. A good test of this would be the Netherlands, which like the United Kingdom had a far flung maritime colonial presence (Portuguese have a significant minor African ancestral contribution, but this is a somewhat different case because Portugal had African slaves in the metropole in the early modern period).

How about Native Americans? Harder for obvious reasons:

I’ve also spotted Amerindian and North Eurasian segments in some samples. These are much tougher to discover using the rare HET/HOM method, simply because Europeans are Eurasians, and more similar to Asians (and thus Amerindians) than to Sub-Saharan Africans. However, with careful (ie. painstaking) work at SPSmart it is possible to isolate such sequences and run a successful MDS analysis, like below (which admittedly does look a bit more fuzzy than the one above, due to a lower nmber of SNPs used).

It seems likely that it is going to be harder to make definitive assessments about individuals, but, one can be confident that there are trace but non-trivial elements of African and Native American ancestry among “Old Americans.” That is, those whose ancestors arrived in the USA before the Revolutionary War, and so have roots in this continent when Native Americans (and Africans as well) were a substantially higher proportion of the human population.

It’s pretty awesome that all this is being done by a self-described amateur. With the emergence of Genomes Unzipped, Dodecad, and BGA we’re in a new era (and thanks to all the researchers who contribute software like ADMIXTURE to the public tool base).

As thanks for the all hard work and transparency of method of the principal behind BGA I’ve dropped a tip into his PayPal account. I know this sort of analysis requires some serious investment of time, but I suspect that these early projects will have a positive spillover effect, showing the intelligent and curious public what can be done with a little perseverance and effort.

Powered by WordPress