Good morning WWW.<\/p>\n
Richard Dawkins publicized the “We Are All Africans”<\/a> t-shirt on Bill Maher’s show, which resulted in a major backlog of orders. The shirt is factually true. But the “Out of Africa” model is not as clean or simple as it would have been 10 years ago. Ironically Dawkins himself tipped his hand as to the complexity of his own thinking in The Ancestor’s Tale<\/a> by\u00a0promoting Alan Templeton’s “Out of Africa again and again”<\/a> hypothesis. Dawkins in the past has shown a keen skepticism of deriving ought<\/em> from is<\/em>, so I’m a touch confused by this current tack, though the maxim on the t-shirt is quite fashionable in our age.<\/p>\n Deep ancestors of human DNA compatible with structured African population<\/a>. Dienekes reviews a paper which came out <\/span>this summer. This is going to make me sound stupid, but did I review the paper?<\/strike> [confused it with another paper, no, this just came out] I’ll have to look. There have been models like this around for years, but the discovery that there’s non-trivial Neandertal admixture<\/a> in non-African populations using the retrieved Neandertal genome should shift our priors a bit in terms of evaluating these papers.<\/p>\n
\nNumber of Competitive House Races Doubles from Recent Years<\/a>. “When I noted this on Twitter on Friday, I got a few sarcastic replies: what good is a forecast if it tells you that essentially anything can happen?” This is the same attitude that conservatives had in 2008. Denial ain’t pretty, but it’s inevitable. Humans are natural born skeptics…when it suits them.<\/p>\n