{"id":34395,"date":"2010-12-07T14:36:01","date_gmt":"2010-12-07T22:36:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/gnxp\/?p=8270"},"modified":"2010-12-10T15:14:26","modified_gmt":"2010-12-10T23:14:26","slug":"the-cultural-construction-of-truth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/2010\/12\/07\/the-cultural-construction-of-truth\/","title":{"rendered":"The cultural construction of truth"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>If you know of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/John_P._A._Ioannidis\">John Ioannidis<\/a>&#8216; work, Jonah Lehrer&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/reporting\/2010\/12\/13\/101213fa_fact_lehrer\">new piece<\/a> in <i>The New Yorker<\/i> won&#8217;t be a surprise to you. It&#8217;s alarmingly titled <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/reporting\/2010\/12\/13\/101213fa_fact_lehrer#ixzz17T102Ugb\">The Truth Wears Off &#8211; is there something wrong with the scientific method?<\/a> Here are some sections which you can&#8217;t get without a subscription, and I think they get to the heart of the problem:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;Whenver I start talking about this,<b> scientists get very nervous<\/b>,&#8221; he says&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>Jennions admits that his findings are troubling, but expresses a reluctance to talk about them publicly. &#8220;<b>This is a very sensitive issue for scientists<\/b>,&#8221; he says. &#8220;You know, we&#8217;re supposed to be dealing with hard facts, the stuff that&#8217;s supposed to stand the test of time. But when you see these trends you become a little more skeptical of things.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>There is no mysterious &#8220;force&#8221; in the universe. The answer is probably going to come down to a combination of the reality of randomness (regression to the mean falls into this category), individual bias, and the cultural incentives of the system of scientific production. This is partly a coordination problem. Most social psychologists, to pick on one discipline which even other psychologists will finger-point toward, are probably aware that their results aren&#8217;t going to be robust over the long haul. But they have tenure to gain, mortgages to pay, and fame to accrue. This is not furthering the <i>collective<\/i> system-building which is science, but the first person to opt-out of rat-race for sexy findings which have publishable <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/P-value\">p-values<\/A> will soon be an ex-scientist.<\/p>\n<p>If you don&#8217;t have a subscription to <i>The New Yorker<\/i>, buying one off the newsstands for an article like this is much more worthwhile than another boring political profile. You should also check out <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC1182327\/\">Why Most Published Research Findings Are False<\/a>. You can read that for free. Also see David Dobbs&#8217; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wired.com\/wiredscience\/2010\/10\/how-to-set-the-bullshit-filter-when-the-bullshit-is-thick\/\">How to Set the Bullshit Filter When the Bullshit is Thick<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><b>Note:<\/b> Statistics are ubiquitous across many of the sciences, but the reality is that most people who use statistics don&#8217;t understand them too well. That&#8217;s not necessarily an issue, most people who use computers don&#8217;t know how they work, but then again, most people don&#8217;t use the mouse as a foot pedal.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/GeneExpressionBlog\/~4\/irv6MfilSQc\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If you know of John Ioannidis&#8216; work, Jonah Lehrer&#8217;s new piece in The New Yorker won&#8217;t be a surprise to you. It&#8217;s alarmingly titled The Truth Wears Off &#8211; is there something wrong with the scientific method? Here are some sections which you can&#8217;t get without a subscription, and I think they get to the [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[511,77],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34395","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-epistemology","category-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34395","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34395"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34395\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":34639,"href":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34395\/revisions\/34639"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34395"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34395"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34395"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}