{"id":35379,"date":"2010-12-22T11:25:52","date_gmt":"2010-12-22T19:25:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/gnxp\/?p=8598"},"modified":"2010-12-30T18:37:26","modified_gmt":"2010-12-31T02:37:26","slug":"heritability-and-genes-as-causes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/2010\/12\/22\/heritability-and-genes-as-causes\/","title":{"rendered":"Heritability and genes as causes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Since the beginning of this weblog (I&#8217;ve been writing for eight years) <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Heritability\">heritability<\/a> has been a major confusion. Even long time readers misunderstand what I&#8217;m trying to get at when I talk about heritability. That&#8217;s why posts such as Mr.\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.genomesunzipped.org\/2010\/12\/estimating-heritability-using-twins.php\">Luke Jostins<\/a>&#8216; are so helpful. I had seen references to a piece online, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prnewswire.com\/news-releases\/the-causes-of-common-diseases-are-not-genetic-concludes-a-new-analysis-111395459.html\">The Causes of Common Diseases are Not Genetic Concludes a New Analysis<\/a>, but\u00a0I hadn&#8217;t given it much thought. Until Ms. Mary Carmichael&#8217;s post <a href=\"http:\/\/marycarmichael.wordpress.com\/2010\/12\/22\/dna-denial-and-the-rise-of-environmental-determinism\/\">DNA, Denial, and the Rise of \u201cEnvironmental Determinism\u201d<\/a>. She begins:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Michael Pollan, the well-known writer on food and agriculture, is a smart guy. His arguments tend to be nuanced and grounded in common sense. I like his basic maxim on nutrition \u2013 \u201cEat food. Not too much. Mostly plants\u201d \u2013 so much that I recently promoted it in a Newsweek cover story. He\u2019s the last person I\u2019d suspect of reactionary thinking, which is why I wish I didn\u2019t have to say this: Michael Pollan has made a deeply unfortunate mistake.<\/p>\n<p>A few days ago, speaking to his 43,000 followers on Twitter, Pollan linked to an essay written by an environmental advocacy group that spends much of its time fighting the depradations of Big Agriculture. Curiously, the essay wasn\u2019t about ecological destruction or even about agriculture. It was about human genetics. It argued that since genetics currently can\u2019t explain everything about inheritance, genes must not influence the development of disease, and thus the causes of illness must be overwhelmingly environmental (meaning \u201cuninherited\u201d as opposed to \u201ccaused by pollution,\u201d though the latter category of factors is part of the former one). This was a little like arguing that your engine doesn\u2019t power your car because sometimes it breaks down in a way that confuses your mechanic \u2014 and concluding that gasoline alone is sufficient to make a car with no engine run. But Pollan took the argument at face value. He said it showed \u201chow the gene-disease paradigm appears to be collapsing.\u201d<strong> He was troubled that its contentions apparently had gone unnoticed: \u201cWhy aren\u2019t we hearing about this?!\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Of course I had seen Dr. Daniel MacArthur&#8217;s post <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/geneticfuture\/2010\/12\/anti-gene_rhetoric.php\">Bioscience Resource Project critique of modern genomics: a missed opportunity<\/a> in my RSS, but when I started reading the rebuttal I immediately thought &#8220;Dr. Dan&#8217;s interlocutors sound kind of dumb,&#8221; and I stopped reading. After reading the post <strong>I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re dumb, I think they&#8217;re being lawyerly.<\/strong> Much of the piece is a rhetorical <em>tour de force<\/em> in leveraging the prejudices and biases of the intended readership<strong>. This is the Intelligent Design version of Left-wing &#8220;Blank Slate&#8221; Creationism.*<\/strong> They smoothly manipulate real findings in a deceptive shell game intended to convince the public, and shape public policy. Their success is evident in Pollan&#8217;s response. &#8220;X paradigm appears to be collapsing.&#8221; &#8220;Why aren&#8217;t we hearing about this?&#8221; Does this sound <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Teach_the_Controversy\">familiar<\/a>? Like Dr. MacArthur I think some of the criticisms within the piece are valid. Despite not being hostile to the maxim &#8220;better living through chemistry,&#8221; I do think that there has been an excessive trend toward pharmaceutical or surgical &#8220;cures&#8221; in relation to diseases of lifestyle (anti-depressants, gastric bypass, etc.). <strong>But we go down a very dangerous path when we make recourse to shoddy means toward ostensibly admirable ends<\/strong>. This sort of discourse is not <strong>sustainable!<\/strong> (just used a buzzword intended to appeal right there!)<\/p>\n<p>I honestly can&#8217;t be bothered to say much more when so many others already have. This is a boat I missed. But if some of what I say above isn&#8217;t clear, I recommend you <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prnewswire.com\/news-releases\/the-causes-of-common-diseases-are-not-genetic-concludes-a-new-analysis-111395459.html\">read the original essay<\/a>. Then read  <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/geneticfuture\/2010\/12\/anti-gene_rhetoric.php\">Dr. MacArthur<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/marycarmichael.wordpress.com\/2010\/12\/22\/dna-denial-and-the-rise-of-environmental-determinism\/\">Ms. Carmichael<\/a>. If you&#8217;re hungry for more, Ms. Carmichael has a helpful list of links.<\/p>\n<p>* Left Creationism had its most negative manifestation as <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Lysenkoism\">Lysenkoism<\/a>, but it suffuses the outlook of many who fear the emergence of a new Nazi abomination. Leon Kamin in the 1970s even claimed that IQ was not heritable at all! Though he backed off such an extreme position, it shows how confident he was that could claim such a thing.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Since the beginning of this weblog (I&#8217;ve been writing for eight years) heritability has been a major confusion. Even long time readers misunderstand what I&#8217;m trying to get at when I talk about heritability. That&#8217;s why posts such as Mr.\u00a0Luke Jostins&#8216; are so helpful. I had seen references to a piece online, The Causes of [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,82,723,227],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35379","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genetics","category-genomics","category-heritability","category-missing-heritability"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35379","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35379"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35379\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35834,"href":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35379\/revisions\/35834"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35379"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35379"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.razib.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35379"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}